ILR Show
Division
FLEECE
COMMITTEE Minutes
August 20, 2009
Conference Call Meeting
- 8:00 pm EST
Committee Members - Val
Carmichael, Lynda Carothers, Betty Moe, Mary Jo
Miller, Fran Soukup - Chair, Pamela Tait - Secretary
CALL TO ORDER:
Meeting was called to order at 8:01 pm EST.
All committee members present.
MINUTES:
Minutes from May 12th meeting – approved by
email and already posted on website.
AGENDA ITEMS:
Review of Fleece Clinic
in Oregon –
The clinic had 20 participants – 9 for the
judging program and 11 educational participants.
Eight of the 9 judging participants passed the
clinic. Betty made a motion to approve the 8 to
apprentice; Mary Jo seconded the motion. Motion
passed unanimously.
Fran will check with ILR office
to make sure that all are/become ILR-SD members in
order to become ILR-SD fleece apprentices.
Committee to come up with
guidelines for future clinics for participants.
We will need a maximum number of participants in
addition to the minimum, based upon projected clinic
expenses, including those as contracted with the
clinic hosts. We also need a minimum age requirement
for the fleece judging and educational participants.
It is noted and appreciated
that Mary Jo donated fleece samples and shipping for
the clinic, and Fran donated fleece samples. Gwen
Ingram, Jim Krowka and Niki Kuklenski put on an
excellent presentation for classic llamas. Oregon
clinic may have turned a profit, but waiting
on costs from clinic host and ILR office, which are
still to come in.
Youth Participation in
Fleece Clinics –
Committee discussed youth at the clinics. After
much discussion about youth ages, parental
supervision, etc, Betty made a motion that youth 18
& under need to be approved by the fleece committee
to attend a fleece judging clinic as an educational
participant. Val seconded the motion. Motion passed
unanimously.
Coat-On judging card
– Re-approval –
A few minor adjustments (clarifications) were
made to the Coat On judging card, based upon input
by Gwen and Jim at the Oregon clinic. Motion to
re-approve Coat On scorecard was made by Pam; Mary
Jo seconded motion. Motion passed unanimously.
Budget for the Fleece
Committee –
The finance committee re-examined our budget. It
was reduced to $800. Approximately $400 has been
spent on conference calls.
Fleece Products –
Definitions
Betty and Lynda are working on Definitions
for Fleece Products. These definitions to
include the items on the fleece products scorecards.
Composite Class –
The committee was asked to give their input on a
Composite Scores class, which would be based
on the placing of the llama within their halter and
fleece classes. It was suggested to use 50% halter /
50% fleece to determine the composite score. As this
is basically a clerical award / class, based solely
on existing classes, the committee was in favor of
it. Betty made a motion to approve the Composite
Score class as stated; Lynda seconded motion.
Motion passed unanimously.
60/40 Halter Class –
The committee was asked to give their input on a
proposed class based on 60% conformation and 40%
fleece. There was much discussion of the pros and
cons of this type of class and how it would affect
entries in both halter and fleece. At this time, our
recommendation would be to not approve this type of
class; but perhaps this could be considered in the
future as an optional class.
Fleece Designation on ILR
Certificate –
The committee was asked to discuss the
possibility of including a fleece designation on the
ILR certificate or on the ILR website. There was
much discussion on: the accuracy of this fleece
designation, as a llamas
fleece can
change types over time; many llamas fall into an
in-between classification; how many judges
designations would be needed, etc. Standards are not
yet clear and precise enough. Concern was expressed
that not only does fleece type change, but, also
fleece coverage. The committees recommendation for
fleece designation on the ILR certificate is that it
is not something that we can do accurately at this
time.
Awards –
The committee reviewed the award suggestions
that Pam had sent out previously by email, and Mary
Jo reviewed the rules committee tentative plan for
awards within the other divisions. The awards system
should be consistent throughout the divisions. It
was pointed out that earning a Fleece Champion
status solely via a Shorn Fleece may not
realistically be attainable due to the adverse
affects shipping fleeces around the country has on
shorn fleeces. Other reasons included the change in
fleece over time, with Grands and Reserves going
less often to older fleeces and the loss of quality
of shorn fleece as it is handled from show to show.
It was suggested that our division should combine
Shorn Fleece, Fleece On and the 2 ounce Sample
placings for each llama to count towards their
Fleece Champion award.
The rules committee is
currently working on point awards. One is similar to
a Championship award and would require 25 points AND
4 Grands or 3 Grands/2 Reserves. Further, a
Certificate of Achievement would be awarded at 25
points, and a Certificate of Excellence would be
awarded at 40 points.
An Elite Fleece Champion was
discussed, which would require Fleece Champion
status in at least 2 of the 3 fleece divisions
(Shorn, Fleece On, 2 ounce Sample). Also discussed
were awards for Fleece Products, such as Fleece
Products Champion and Elite Fleece Products
Champion. Pam to work further on fleece products
awards.
Recognition awards for ranches
and farms were discussed. These would be geared
towards the overall success of ranches/farms with
their fleeces, whether shorn or fleece on. These
awards can be earned yearly, as well as
cumulatively. Pam and Val to work on ranch / farm
awards.
The committee will also work on
establishing a list of optional show awards for show
superintendants, which will be added to the Show
Management Guide.
Listing of Fiber Mills
–
The committee was asked to come up with a list
of fiber mills that could be added to the ILR site
as a convenience for owners. Lynda has been working
on this for the committee. It was suggested that a
nominal annual fee be charged to the fiber mills who
want to be listed in order to A) pay for the upkeep
of the list, and B) to keep the list accurate and
up-to-date over the years. The office could charge a
member fee and a non-member fee for this service. It
was also suggested that we can make this a listing
of not only fiber processing services, but also
knitting and spinning services. Lynda to put
together a sample form for Fran to take to the GB
meeting on Tuesday.
Mail-In Fleece Show –
Mary Jo had received a request to determine
whether a fleece show can be mail-in only. It was
pointed out that fleeces can already be mailed in
and there are no rules stating that a fleece show
cannot be solely mail-in.
FAQs for Exhibitors –
addition –
Mary Jo presented the FAQ question of: What
information needs to be on the entry form?, as well
as the corresponding answers. Pam made a motion to
approve this additional FAQ; Betty seconded motion.
Motion passed unanimously.
How-to Ship Fleeces –
Different methods of shipping shorn fleeces were
discussed, as well as sending fleeces in plastic
bags versus tissue or tablecloths. Suggestions for
shipping shorn fleeces will be added to the FAQs
for Exhibitors. To be developed by Fran.
Next conference call meeting
will be set via email.
Mary Jo made a motion to
adjourn the meeting; Betty seconded motion.
Motion passed unanimously, and the meeting was
adjourned at 9:55 EST.
Minutes submitted by Pamela
Tait, ILR-SD Fiber Committee secretary.